Este trabajo intentará trabajar un interrogante que propone Lacan en el Seminario 10, acerca de la neurosis de transferencia. Allí se pregunta si es o no la misma que se detectaba al comienzo. Situados en este problema, se articularán la neurosis de transferencia y la repetición. Y tal conjunción se debatirá a la luz de inquietudes particulares del filósofo danés Sören Kierkegaard, y del escritor español Miguel de Unamuno. Palabras clave Psicoanálisis, Repetición, Neurosis de Transferencia, Kierkegaard ABSTRACT A RESULT AND AN EXISTENCE. DIALOGUES BETWEEN UNAMUNO, KIERKEGAARD AND TRANSFERENCE NEUROSIS The aim of this paper is to work on Lacan’s questioning in Seminar 10, in reference to transference neurosis, in which he raises the question on whether it is the same as it was in the coining of the concept. The conspicuous setbacks and misunderstandings in analysis of that time compel Lacan to ask himself the place of subject “a”, as well as analyst’s desire on transference. Being situated in this issue, we can articulate transference neurosis and repetition. And such conjunction will be discussed in view of the Danish philosopher Sören Kierkegaard’s writings, as of the Spanich writer Miguel de Unamuno. Key words Transference neurosis, Repetition, Psychoanalysis, Kierkegaard